I don't know what to think, haven't a deep enough understanding of Egypt to know what to think. I'm rather blown away by all of it.
All of it.
How do you turn off the Internet?
Al Jazeera's coverage is vital. Biased, too? Sure, almost certainly. But then, who are we Americans to judge someone else's biased media, really? Al Jazeera's livestream is here.
And (paging Mr. Peretz) it turns out that Arabs value each other and community and all of the things we value. This item brought a tear to my eye. Also this one.
Mubarek's been our ally, but we've also pumped millions into pro-democracy groups over there; so while the situation is fraught, it seems to be what we asked for, ultimately. And no, I'm not worried about the Muslim Brotherhood. Mubarek and John Bolton are worried about the Muslim Brotherhood, which tells me there are more important things happening.
Yemen, now Yemen is scary. Egypt? I don't know what to think.
Hope everyone is ok, and that the outcome doesn't hurt more than the status quo.
Friday, January 28, 2011
Thursday, January 27, 2011
So that's what the kids are calling it
Ted Haggard says he's probably "what the kids call bisexual." Ok.
These days when I see his face all I can think is, that poor man. What a huge lonely gaping wound he is.
GQ profile here.
These days when I see his face all I can think is, that poor man. What a huge lonely gaping wound he is.
GQ profile here.
Is what it is
Ever notice that when someone starts with, "Partisan politics aside," they're about to be mad at a Democrat?
Likewise, if they say, "I don't like either party!" they're about to defend a Republican.
It just is what it is.
Likewise, if they say, "I don't like either party!" they're about to defend a Republican.
It just is what it is.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
More on jobs and the SOTU
Reich: The president ignored the elephant in the room
Ezra: Can we win the future if we lose the present?
Ezra: Can we win the future if we lose the present?
I sat in on a briefing yesterday where various "senior administration officials" explained the theory behind the State of the Union. When they were asked about shifting their focus to the future when the economy was so bad in the present, they explained that they got pretty much everything they thought they could get -- and, in fact, more than they thought they could get -- in the tax-cut deal, and it was time to let that work. Left unsaid is that they can't get anything more out of a Republican House, and so there's little point in begging.
And now, a shout out from The Hammock of Complacency & Dependency
Paul Ryan's response to the SOTU was a bit disappointing, I have to say. The only republican willing to come up with a Roadmap of specific spending cuts and policy changes was uncharacteristically vague, his words mostly just standard GOP doctrine. (Including swipes at England and Ireland which were just, well, ill-informed and wrong.)
The problem, as always, is that these vague platitudes may sound idyllic to some ears, but only because they are not upfront about cuts and policy changes.
Ryan's language was, most likely, constrained by the party. While I believe he's enthusiastic about his Roadmap, there is little to love in there for economists or the general public. Medicare is basically dismantled, Social Security is privatized (this, from the party that thinks too much regulatory burden has been placed on Wall Street over the last two years), and still the Roadmap wouldn't balance the budget until 2063, and the deficit still wouldn't have been addressed.
But it's really all they have. Rand Paul's proposed legislation will not go anywhere. No one else in the Republican party can name any cuts that impact the deficit in any meaningful way. They have Ryan. But his roadmap won't stand up to scrutiny or politics, and they know it.
So, we are offered pretty platitudes, because accounting doesn't win hearts and minds, in the hope that we'll keep the GOP in the majority, maybe elect a Republican resident in 2012. Keep tax breaks for their friends - and themselves. Let's not forget that congress is overwhelmingly made up of very affluent people.
That's what Ryan gave us. That, and the now-required insult for people like me, people lounging in The Hammock of Complacency and Dependency. I won't argue there's a certain amount of torpor over here, which you could interpret as complacency. But I promise you, this feels nothing like a hammock.
Also too: Joan Walsh. Justin Fox. Yglesias.
And also likewise, I was going to say something about Bachman, but sometimes, in the face of utter stupidity, words fail. So I'll direct you here, instead.
The problem, as always, is that these vague platitudes may sound idyllic to some ears, but only because they are not upfront about cuts and policy changes.
Ryan's language was, most likely, constrained by the party. While I believe he's enthusiastic about his Roadmap, there is little to love in there for economists or the general public. Medicare is basically dismantled, Social Security is privatized (this, from the party that thinks too much regulatory burden has been placed on Wall Street over the last two years), and still the Roadmap wouldn't balance the budget until 2063, and the deficit still wouldn't have been addressed.
But it's really all they have. Rand Paul's proposed legislation will not go anywhere. No one else in the Republican party can name any cuts that impact the deficit in any meaningful way. They have Ryan. But his roadmap won't stand up to scrutiny or politics, and they know it.
So, we are offered pretty platitudes, because accounting doesn't win hearts and minds, in the hope that we'll keep the GOP in the majority, maybe elect a Republican resident in 2012. Keep tax breaks for their friends - and themselves. Let's not forget that congress is overwhelmingly made up of very affluent people.
That's what Ryan gave us. That, and the now-required insult for people like me, people lounging in The Hammock of Complacency and Dependency. I won't argue there's a certain amount of torpor over here, which you could interpret as complacency. But I promise you, this feels nothing like a hammock.
Also too: Joan Walsh. Justin Fox. Yglesias.
And also likewise, I was going to say something about Bachman, but sometimes, in the face of utter stupidity, words fail. So I'll direct you here, instead.
The missing word
Andrew Leonard notes The missing word in Obama's State of the Union.
Doesn't change the fact that you can train 100,000 science teachers, but you can't get them hired without direct investment. You can promote clean energy development and transportation infrastructure, but you can't make it happen without direct investment.
And even if investments here and there make it through congress, the fact remains that tens of millions of us find ourselves having to start over, while there are five people for every available job in this country, we're heading into the second big housing market decline, foreclosures continue apace, and the safety net has run out.
And even if the Republicans were to eliminate every "job killing" regulation on their wish list and capitalist heaven materialized on Wall Street, high unemployment and stress means that we won't be spending the money that drives the economy, not like we used to.
I'm a person who likes to think in terms of the long arc, and maybe there's still the chance that Obama can enact policies which will have a positive impact on my son's generation. But I have to say, I sort of feel like roadkill, and that sucks.
The unemployment rate in the United States is 9.4 percent. But if you went to President Barack Obama's State of the Union address on Tuesday night looking for a job, you came away empty. The president did not even mention the word "unemployment." The stock market "has come roaring back," he told America, and "corporate profits are up." But aside from one reference to "the shuttered windows of once booming factories, and the vacant storefronts of once busy Main Streets," Obama devoted precious little time to the current plight of Americans who might be facing foreclosure or the expiration of their unemployment benefits. Instead he told us that the "worst of the recession is over" and that we had "broken the back of the recession."Leonard notes reality: with the congress we've got, there's almost no chance that unemployment will be directly addressed. The president is working within practical restraints. That doesn't change the discouraging feeling that we've been given up on.
Doesn't change the fact that you can train 100,000 science teachers, but you can't get them hired without direct investment. You can promote clean energy development and transportation infrastructure, but you can't make it happen without direct investment.
And even if investments here and there make it through congress, the fact remains that tens of millions of us find ourselves having to start over, while there are five people for every available job in this country, we're heading into the second big housing market decline, foreclosures continue apace, and the safety net has run out.
And even if the Republicans were to eliminate every "job killing" regulation on their wish list and capitalist heaven materialized on Wall Street, high unemployment and stress means that we won't be spending the money that drives the economy, not like we used to.
I'm a person who likes to think in terms of the long arc, and maybe there's still the chance that Obama can enact policies which will have a positive impact on my son's generation. But I have to say, I sort of feel like roadkill, and that sucks.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Jobs in the SOTU
I will have to spend some time tomorrow re-looking at the speech and thinking about it. He did talk about the need for investment. But, as Maddow observes, it came off as a sort of "prayer to the free market."
Maddow is reading the poltical wisdom in the speech, and to be fair, I'll need to look at it again. I went in tonight with tired eyes, my respect for the president notwithstanding.
Maddow is reading the poltical wisdom in the speech, and to be fair, I'll need to look at it again. I went in tonight with tired eyes, my respect for the president notwithstanding.
Matthews nails it
Having a look at the person the Tea Party chose to do their rebuttal, because I don't have the capacity for long-form thought right now.
They're selling a scriptural version of the founding of this country, promising we can get there again. It's like heaven! It's all bullshit, but Bachman probably doesn't know that. She's honestly crazy. Sal Russo, however, knows it. He just wants tax cuts and libertarian ponies.
Anyway, good TV from Matthews and Joan Walsh.
They're selling a scriptural version of the founding of this country, promising we can get there again. It's like heaven! It's all bullshit, but Bachman probably doesn't know that. She's honestly crazy. Sal Russo, however, knows it. He just wants tax cuts and libertarian ponies.
Anyway, good TV from Matthews and Joan Walsh.
"Accounting is important."
So sayeth Eugene Robinson, noting that accounting's great, but it doesn't "win hearts and minds." Which may be true, but accounting is preferable to fantasies about libertarian sparkle ponies. Which are probably all we're going to get.
Math is hard, ok. But I think grown ups should be able to handle it.
Math is hard, ok. But I think grown ups should be able to handle it.
"The worst of the recession"
Is not over for an awful lot of us.
And I do not want to hear that my government will "sacrifice" like "American families" do, because all that means is that people in my situation and people far worse off will be the sacrificial animals.
Someone, convince me that we're not fucked.
And I do not want to hear that my government will "sacrifice" like "American families" do, because all that means is that people in my situation and people far worse off will be the sacrificial animals.
Someone, convince me that we're not fucked.
To remove barriers to growth and investment
he should provide psychiatric care and Pell grants to the house republicans.
Jobs, jobs, jobs
Our president is inspiring and good, and all of that, but: I'm looking at the 55 year-old woman who's going for a degree in biotech, and I'm thinking, great! Too bad no company in this country will be hiring a 55 year old woman to do anything earning a decent living, at least not any time soon.
Jobs. Jobs. Jobs.
We are so fucked if the Hill doesn't start taking this seriously.
Jobs. Jobs. Jobs.
We are so fucked if the Hill doesn't start taking this seriously.
WTF
I'm telling myself that the president is SO HIP, he knows what Winning The Future becomes on Twitter.
The mood at my house
The husband asks: "Who's Yertle the Turtle over there?"
That's Mitch McConnell, honey.
"What a turtle of a man."
Well the other one retired, and there he was.
That's Mitch McConnell, honey.
"What a turtle of a man."
Well the other one retired, and there he was.
Let's see who has a prom date
Or maybe it's more of a Sadie Hawkins Day type of thing.
Biden's date, through no fault of his own, is John Boehner. For his part, Boehner looks like he adjusted his makeup shade a touch.
Still waiting, still thinking of England.
Justice Roberts decided to show. Scalia, Thomas, and Alito have decided that this is all beneath them.
Word is, Obama will call for lower corporate tax rates, which will piss me off immeasurably.
Hillary love- it's catching.
Fanfare....
Biden's date, through no fault of his own, is John Boehner. For his part, Boehner looks like he adjusted his makeup shade a touch.
Still waiting, still thinking of England.
Justice Roberts decided to show. Scalia, Thomas, and Alito have decided that this is all beneath them.
Word is, Obama will call for lower corporate tax rates, which will piss me off immeasurably.
Hillary love- it's catching.
Fanfare....
Segregation and Calvinism and blah blah blah ... Or: why I'm not optimistic going into the SOTU
So this upsets me:
Ms. Williams-Bolar is poor and black, while the school she sent her kids to is in an affluent white neighborhood.
(And yes, I do understand that under the current terms of debate, pointing this out makes me a racist. Maybe Kelley Williams-Bolar is a racist, too, come to think of it. Why didn't she want her kids in a black school?)
The judge pointed out that her fraud cost the school district in question $30,000, and he made an example out of her so that others would not be tempted to commit similar fraud.
What did it cost the county to prosecute this woman? In this era of "fiscal responsibility", what's the ROI?
But more importantly: who looks at this situation and thinks, right, it's obvious: she broke the law and needs to go to jail. How can one not look at this situation and think maybe there's something wrong with that law?
Anyway. We segregate. We do it by zip code or street map, but we really do it by income. In terms of policy, we have decided that the affluent deserve better breaks and their children deserve better educations. We've gone all Calvinist, which is convenient, because it absolves us as individuals and as a society of any responsibility.
So that's what I'm thinking about as I await the SOTU. That and the economic decline in Britain. Let's see what the president has to offer.
She receives government assistance, works with disabled kids, and pursuing a teaching degree which would, presumably, better her family's situation. She falsified a record so that she could send her kids to a better school.AKRON, Ohio – A Summit County woman will spend 10 days in jail after she was found guilty in a school residency case that could set a precedent for Ohio school districts.
Ms. Williams-Bolar is poor and black, while the school she sent her kids to is in an affluent white neighborhood.
(And yes, I do understand that under the current terms of debate, pointing this out makes me a racist. Maybe Kelley Williams-Bolar is a racist, too, come to think of it. Why didn't she want her kids in a black school?)
The judge pointed out that her fraud cost the school district in question $30,000, and he made an example out of her so that others would not be tempted to commit similar fraud.
What did it cost the county to prosecute this woman? In this era of "fiscal responsibility", what's the ROI?
But more importantly: who looks at this situation and thinks, right, it's obvious: she broke the law and needs to go to jail. How can one not look at this situation and think maybe there's something wrong with that law?
Anyway. We segregate. We do it by zip code or street map, but we really do it by income. In terms of policy, we have decided that the affluent deserve better breaks and their children deserve better educations. We've gone all Calvinist, which is convenient, because it absolves us as individuals and as a society of any responsibility.
So that's what I'm thinking about as I await the SOTU. That and the economic decline in Britain. Let's see what the president has to offer.
SOTU 2011 in 52 minutes...
And I've decided to see if I remember how to communicate in longer bursts than Facebook status updates.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)